Donate











Greywolf79 @ 07:35:09
l3lackhorse @ 07:23:21
Commander J. @ 07:21:45






Firefox 3


Solaris7 Communication Center - A trend?
Solaris7 Communication Center
Solaris7 Communication Center
Home | Profile | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ | | Forum Statistics | RSS
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Classic Battletech
 General Classic Battletech Discussion
 A trend?
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

Nevaron
Sergeant

View S7 Profile
87 Posts

Posted - 07/29/2010 :  16:58:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hmm, maybe I should poke my nose in on some of the designs I'm less likely to use (I've mostly been looking for lvl 1 designs for my 3025 game). I have resisted the urge to comment on mis-labeled designs as I haven't tried posting myself and can't comment on the proper way to fix it (refering to tech type, lots of things seem to be labeled Introductory that are full of the latest tech). In any case, the point is well made, and it never hurts to have a reminder... the internet is for the most part a "faceless" area and some folks might vent their spleens a bit more adamantly than if they were face to face with someone.

"The problem with overwhelming firepower is that you also want me to rebuild everything you atomize!" -- unknown Tech
Go to Top of Page

Warhawk
Major

3080 Posts

Posted - 07/29/2010 :  17:07:12  Show Profile  Send Warhawk a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
Nevaron that's actually a site issue rather than a 'Mech issue. When those new statuses came out they didn't apply correctly to older designs.

The beatings will continue until MY morale improves.

Knowledge brings fear.
- Mars U.

If guns kill people, then you can blame your pencil for misspelled words.
- Larry the Cable Guy

Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun

Satire is when you make fun of people who are smarter than you.
Irony is when you make fun of people who are richer than you.
Burlesque is when you make fun of people who are smarter and richer than you while taking off your clothes.
- Heard on NPR
Go to Top of Page

Samak
Lieutenant

View S7 Profile
United States
350 Posts

Posted - 07/29/2010 :  17:34:03  Show Profile  Send Samak an AOL message  Reply with Quote
Nevaron, feel free to review any of mine and let me know what you think i have crappy designs I thought were good, good designs I thought were crappy, a couple that just made some people say "cool". Add your two cents I'm always happy to read opinions, Blessed Blake knows I have enough of my own.

Peace through Superior Firepower

Beware of stupid people in large groups

Man only need two tools, WD-40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and it should, use WD-40, if it does move and it shouldn't use the Duct Tape-Author Unknown, internet wisdom
Go to Top of Page

Knightmare
Premier Member

View S7 Profile
United Kingdom
4459 Posts

Posted - 07/29/2010 :  19:00:45  Show Profile  Visit Knightmare's Homepage  Click to see Knightmare's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
There's always a fine line between constructive criticism and and being a jerk.

I guess the trick is just remembering that this is supposed to be fun. Fun for you and fun for the person posting the design. Remembering that not everyone finds "fun" the same way or in the same things you do. Everyone's hobby is a little different and personal. Keep that little gem in the back of your noodle and with a healthy dose of common courtesy we'll have a super conductive, thriving generator of uber awesome creativity. (How's that for adjective use!)

Go to Top of Page

Nevaron
Sergeant

View S7 Profile
87 Posts

Posted - 07/29/2010 :  20:37:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Ah, thanks Warhawk... there were always a few mislabeled, but I'd begun to think that there were a handful slamming them out w/o thinking. Pardon if I get annoyed at that, mostly its just the week I'm having... which, of course, I should not take out on you fine folks. Oh, and Samak, I can forgive any design from you for the simple act of plastering the WD-40/Duct tape thing on your sig, I seem to be the only one in my area who hadn't heard that :P

Yes Knightmare, impressive use of Adjectives :) And here's to dancing that line successfully for all of us.

"The problem with overwhelming firepower is that you also want me to rebuild everything you atomize!" -- unknown Tech
Go to Top of Page

Einherjar
Lieutenant

View S7 Profile
USA
589 Posts

Posted - 07/29/2010 :  21:19:39  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I wonder if the lack of reviews by some of the old dogs happens to be from a lack of available time online? In my case, my life has gotten a lot more busy in the last year, and I've had little time to spend online. When I come to S7, I mostly browse the forums, and for the most part, completely ignore the New Additions. Its not exactly the way I'd LIKE things to be, but, its the way it is. I of course don't know if that's the case with everyone, but I wonder.

At any rate, as Knightmare would say, there's my pence.

"Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't coming back. Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me" - Firefly

Cry Havoc and let slip the 'Mechs of war!
Go to Top of Page

MechRat
Lieutenant

View S7 Profile
United States
303 Posts

Posted - 07/30/2010 :  05:36:00  Show Profile  Send MechRat a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
While I certainly wouldn't consider myself an "Oldtimer", I have been a member for the past four years and was posting reviews back then. I haven't the time available lately that I wish I did (much like Ein), so my involvement has been mainly reading and occasionally posting in the forums. I have always been a believer of constructive - and not destructive - criticism, as that information can be used to improve your own work. I value S7 as a place to share and discuss all things BattleTech, free from the idiocy, hostility, and general bad attitudes that can invade sites like this. Let's keep up the good work!

________________________________________________________




"If someone tells you it's impossible, it's because they want to beat you to it and be the first."
(Rule #8, Buck Savage's Survival Guide)

"Beware the quiet ones, for you know not what they think." - me
Go to Top of Page

Vidar
Lieutenant

View S7 Profile
United States
502 Posts

Posted - 07/30/2010 :  08:20:30  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think that we each have some sacred cows that we love, no XL on assaults, fast lights, Panthers and Dragons. The changes to these sacred cows get our dander up and we forget our manners. So as long as we can try to remember that everyone need to learn and try to help them we should be all right. However the designer is also expected to listen, and 10% of barrel will always be rotten.

Epsilon Team, by your shield or on it
Go to Top of Page

LostInSpace
Premier Member

View S7 Profile
United States
1667 Posts

Posted - 07/30/2010 :  09:40:39  Show Profile  Visit LostInSpace's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Vidar

However the designer is also expected to listen,

One thing I've learned over my time here: I never expect the designer to listen, especially considering the actual design. If I'm so pissed off that someone did something in a "bad" way, I'll go and create a variant (have yet to reach that point). Offering suggestions in a helpful and courteous manner is one thing, expecting someone to change based on those suggestions is entirely something else. They'll change if they want to, and should never be expected to.

If half the people out there were expected to listen to suggestions, most of the 'Mechs would have been redesigned down to a few basic chassis that everyone uses, and we wouldn't be bothering with construction rules because all the machines look the same anyway.

Every 'Mech design is valid in some sense or in some tactical situation. There are no "absolute no-no's", sacred cows do not exist.

</opinion piece>

EDIT: Oh wait, I guess this is my "sacred cow"...

"Uh.,.. this was made by Clan Hot Dog for te uberness" - Major Tom

Edited by - LostInSpace on 07/30/2010 09:43:28
Go to Top of Page

Ice Hellion
Premier Member

France
4606 Posts

Posted - 07/30/2010 :  10:19:24  Show Profile  Visit Ice Hellion's Homepage  Click to see Ice Hellion's MSN Messenger address  Send Ice Hellion a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
@Knightmare: giving a score is a difficult task, I was never able to make a difference between 4 and 5 or 1 and 2 (3 is rather easy) but I know it might be important for some people so I prefer not to rate the designs (at least most of them).

Go to Top of Page

Knightmare
Premier Member

View S7 Profile
United Kingdom
4459 Posts

Posted - 07/30/2010 :  13:16:42  Show Profile  Visit Knightmare's Homepage  Click to see Knightmare's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
I hear ya Ice. I'm just saying that sometimes it's easier than writing a long comment to a design you like a simple 4 or 5 with a "Good Work" will suffice.

But I second Lost.

A designer shouldn't and doesn't have to listen to one bloody thing. It's their hobby, they'll play it as they see fit. Plus, it's important to bear in mind that for some players the actual GAME of BattleTech means very little. It's the fictional UNIVERSE they get their kicks from. (I fall into the later category.)

For me, building a new design with or without an XL engine comes down to how I interpret the story, not how it plays on the table top. So "suggested" or demanding one type of engine over another is worthless to someone like me. Sure I'll listen, but it literally goes through one ear and out the other. It's not that I don't respect what you're saying, it's just that my hobby and therefore my primary source of enjoyment is dictated by a different part of the game system than say yours.

Go to Top of Page

Donteras
Sergeant

View S7 Profile
United States
210 Posts

Posted - 08/03/2010 :  13:12:18  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I honestly don't think Kit hit the nail on the head with his armory. Everything he did with that armory was mean-spirited and I don't think the community was in the least improved by his revolt.

I do like that this subject is being discussed, however. I personally don't feel it is really a big deal, however. I have felt the pinch of what I thought were bad reviews, tho, and I admit to reacting badly to them. Personally, I've always written my reviews as suggestions or mere idea exchange. I've always felt that the designer has the right to ignore what I type anyway. It's when it gets more important than that that trouble usually happens.

___________________________________________
A day without fusion is like a day without sunshine.
Go to Top of Page

Ice Hellion
Premier Member

France
4606 Posts

Posted - 08/04/2010 :  10:25:00  Show Profile  Visit Ice Hellion's Homepage  Click to see Ice Hellion's MSN Messenger address  Send Ice Hellion a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Donteras
I've always felt that the designer has the right to ignore what I type anyway.



You are right.

Go to Top of Page

LostInSpace
Premier Member

View S7 Profile
United States
1667 Posts

Posted - 08/04/2010 :  14:55:07  Show Profile  Visit LostInSpace's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Donteras

I honestly don't think Kit hit the nail on the head with his armory. Everything he did with that armory was mean-spirited and I don't think the community was in the least improved by his revolt.

In my mind, what Kit was trying to get across is that the stats aren't really that important, or historically haven't been that important, here at S7. Since I've been here the order of the day has been fluff, fluff, and more fluff. Even just a paragraph detailing why you designed it a certain way was enough. But what Kit encountered when he started posting again was people ignoring fluff and simply focusing on the numbers, saying how and why things should be done, ignoring the fact that maybe he had a reason to do things one way instead of another. Fluff got ignored.

And that seems to be what S7 has always been about: creative writing. For a time there it seemed the site was moving away from that solid base, now it feels more on-track.

But I also realize the fluff mentality can be pretty intimidating. First time I posted a design I was scared ****less that it wouldn't fit the bill. I lurked for a while and figured out what people were doing and why. Other people have jumped in running with good success.

Anyway, I guess I (and others) get a little pissed off when I've (we've) obviously spent quite a bit of time writing half a novel up above, and someone is nit-picking my (our) choice of systems or ammo in a review (ammo, I might add, is purely for the pilot to decide on before the battle). And yeah, exchanging ideas is a good thing, but I have rarely encountered reviews like that; instead we get stuff like "you should do this instead".

There are exceptions; people like Recoil, who ONLY wants thoughts on how the thing will do on the battlefield, and not cries for MOAR FLUFF! They get what they want: "here's why it doesn't work, here's what looks good, decent job on the numbers."

But, quite frankly, looking at numbers all day is BOOOOOORING. Entertain me! I'll try to do the same!

"Uh.,.. this was made by Clan Hot Dog for te uberness" - Major Tom
Go to Top of Page

Samak
Lieutenant

View S7 Profile
United States
350 Posts

Posted - 08/04/2010 :  16:14:09  Show Profile  Send Samak an AOL message  Reply with Quote
In going with what LiS is saying, there does seem to be a number of posters who are only after all powerful death machines and are unhappy when someone asks "well, why to the Cappies have a light with 4 gauss and how did they do it?" Major Tom's quote come's to mind. If we all built only gausszzillas or pulse laser boats it would be boring, and without fluff its actually just a math problem

Peace through Superior Firepower

Beware of stupid people in large groups

Man only need two tools, WD-40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and it should, use WD-40, if it does move and it shouldn't use the Duct Tape-Author Unknown, internet wisdom
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Solaris7 Communication Center © 2000-02 Solaris7 Industries Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000

Copyright © 2010 Solaris7 Industries.  All Rights Reserved

WizKids LLC has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Classic BattleTech. WizKids, LLC has granted permission to Solaris7.com to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any written materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with, Solaris7.com in any official capacity whatsoever.
http://www.milonic.com